As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in belongings (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement belongings, DC plans carry vital duty for guaranteeing sturdy monetary outcomes for members1. In 2025, plan sponsors should give attention to optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody vital areas similar to goal date fund choice, payment transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Suggestions for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Making the most of all out there data within the evaluate and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to contemplate. First, as with every funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in stories produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that may function a information when evaluating varied TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which might be appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by means of the trouble of discovering an awesome funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, reasonably than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan may be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights lead to plan members paying greater funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We recommend plan sponsors take into account the affect on members of their present mutual fund share lessons, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for similar CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share lessons of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply larger payment transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share lessons.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations comply with the same format: a take a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we propose supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with energetic administration or passive administration. We recommend such a evaluate a minimum of each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant approach.
Determine 1: Normal Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes ought to be altered. Elements for the dialogue might embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examinestaff reported spending a minimum of three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We’ve seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages might help staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big position — significantly for workforces the place a big share of the inhabitants isn’t at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff searching for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Obligations
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of immediately’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively affect an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may range from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With vital provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand new tax laws. Adjustments to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so it will likely be necessary for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture belongings.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to observe plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers offered? It is very important be aware that this subject covers each vendor bills, similar to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, similar to selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture belongings is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture belongings to cut back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for hundreds of thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they’ll improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making shall be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant affect in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such data isn’t assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDICand funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution isn’t registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Client Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.